<!-- Derived Markdown alternate of index.md; canonical repository sources and registered evidence retain authority. -->


# DSIC and GP clinical safety

**A source-based knowledge base and a single-file reference for reviewing England GP software hazard logs.**

<blockquote class="governing-question"><p>What DSIC and related requirements apply to England GP record software, and what evidence is needed to review an Excel clinical safety hazard log without mistaking missing evidence for non-compliance?</p></blockquote>

[Copilot guide](https://dsic-clinical-safety.pages.dev/copilot-guide/index.md){ .md-button .md-button--primary }
[Offline reference](https://dsic-clinical-safety.pages.dev/offline-reference/index.md){ .md-button .md-button--primary }

The supplied research has been checked and expanded, including relevant work from four existing local knowledge bases. The refreshed pack contains **184 controls, 35 scenarios and 95 source entries**. Source verification is bounded and explicit. No product or workbook has been assessed.

## Start here

| Reader task | Open |
|---|---|
| Understand DSIC and applicability | [Foundations and standards](https://dsic-clinical-safety.pages.dev/standards/index.md) |
| Separate manufacturer and deployment duties | [Responsibilities](https://dsic-clinical-safety.pages.dev/assurance-responsibilities/index.md) |
| Examine the review controls | [Control catalogue](https://dsic-clinical-safety.pages.dev/review-controls/index.md) |
| Challenge plausible safety scenarios | [Hazards and evidence](https://dsic-clinical-safety.pages.dev/hazard-scenarios/index.md) |
| Prepare the closed-network Copilot review | [Copilot guide](https://dsic-clinical-safety.pages.dev/copilot-guide/index.md) |
| Transfer the self-contained file | [Offline reference](https://dsic-clinical-safety.pages.dev/offline-reference/index.md) |
| Inspect what was reconfirmed | [Source audit](https://dsic-clinical-safety.pages.dev/source-audit/index.md) and [local synthesis](https://dsic-clinical-safety.pages.dev/local-research/index.md) |

## Evidence boundary

A missing hazard-log entry usually establishes missing evidence in the supplied material. A demonstrated nonconformance needs an applicable requirement and contradictory evidence. Keep proposal, implementation, verification and acceptance separate.

Research cut-off: **28 October 2026**. Current metadata is distinct from the product’s adopted baseline. See [open dependencies](https://dsic-clinical-safety.pages.dev/validation-queue/index.md), [source register](https://dsic-clinical-safety.pages.dev/sources/index.md), [concept architecture](https://dsic-clinical-safety.pages.dev/architecture/index.md), [knowledge graph](https://dsic-clinical-safety.pages.dev/graph/index.md) and [agent guide](https://dsic-clinical-safety.pages.dev/llm-wiki/index.md).

## Research trail

Read [purpose and scope](https://dsic-clinical-safety.pages.dev/topic/index.md) before selecting controls. Use the [interface inventory](https://dsic-clinical-safety.pages.dev/interfaces/index.md) to identify conditional service dependencies. The [evidence matrix](https://dsic-clinical-safety.pages.dev/evidence-matrix/index.md) distinguishes supported research claims from open questions, and the [research log](https://dsic-clinical-safety.pages.dev/log/index.md) records how the reference was assembled.